Blog 8: Change to my study programme
Today I will write about the changes that I think should be made to my career, both for the well-being of the students and for the proper learning of them.
Throughout the 3 years that I have been in my career, I have been able to realize some flaws as for the curricular mesh, as for example the inclusion of some subjects that, in my opinion, do not contribute in anything to the competencies that a student may have. We have often seen these subjects as “filling courses”.
Another very large flaw that I have been able to detect has been the academic burden and the long timetable of classes, many times (especially in first year) I had class schedules in which I had to be from 9 AM to 6 PM almost every day in the university. I live in Maipú and it takes me between an hour and a half and two hours to get to college (back to my house is the same), so this lifestyle is very tiring.
As for the facilities of my faculty, these are very small and for most courses, we depend on the agronomy facilities to have classes. The Pabellón Arauco has classrooms and computer rooms, but they are very small and do not cope with all the students of the career.
According to me, my teachers take good advantage of the technological resources that we have within reach, but I think that if we had more resources (money), we could learn better with other resources. Example of this is to have greater access to laboratories of chemistry, physics, botany, to do more work of nursery plants, etc.
The teaching methods of many teachers, I consider that they are not the best. Many times it is noted that they have no pedagogy because they really teach very badly, and I think it would be very good that they were required to do the pedagogy.
Throughout the 3 years that I have been in my career, I have been able to realize some flaws as for the curricular mesh, as for example the inclusion of some subjects that, in my opinion, do not contribute in anything to the competencies that a student may have. We have often seen these subjects as “filling courses”.Another very large flaw that I have been able to detect has been the academic burden and the long timetable of classes, many times (especially in first year) I had class schedules in which I had to be from 9 AM to 6 PM almost every day in the university. I live in Maipú and it takes me between an hour and a half and two hours to get to college (back to my house is the same), so this lifestyle is very tiring.As for the facilities of my faculty, these are very small and for most courses, we depend on the agronomy facilities to have classes. The Pabellón Arauco has classrooms and computer rooms, but they are very small and do not cope with all the students of the career.According to me, my teachers take good advantage of the technological resources that we have within reach, but I think that if we had more resources (money), we could learn better with other resources. Example of this is to have greater access to laboratories of chemistry, physics, botany, to do more work of nursery plants, etc.
The teaching methods of many teachers, I consider that they are not the best. Many times it is noted that they have no pedagogy because they really teach very badly, and I think it would be very good that they were required to do the pedagogy.
nice! regards
ResponderEliminar